Kalpesh, if you cannot read this email you can view it at: http://cecollect.com/ve/ZZ95906799BkB877174a63
Field Fisher Waterhouse

German court restricts exclusive purchase obligation


September 2007




Field Fisher Waterhouse LLP

35 Vine Street
London
EC3N 2AA

Tel: +44 (0)20 7861 4000
Fax: +44 (0)20 7488 0084

www.ffw.com



European Franchising Network

EuropeanFranchising.com is an online information resource service for businesses considering using franchising as a way of developing their market in Europe.

Europeanfranchising.com offers a seamless one stop online service for all franchising matters within all EU Member States. It aims to save franchisors time, money and aggravation by making available to them relevant commercial and legal information on franchising in the EU. It is operated by Field Fisher Waterhouse LLP, the EU's leading franchise lawyers. It is edited by Mark Abell, Chairman of the European Franchising Network ("EfN"), who is recognised by Chambers and Partners Guide to the legal profession as the No1 legal adviser for the franchising sector.


Our German Group

We have a well-known German Group that advises our US and UK clients on franchising in German speaking Europe. The group is headed by dual qualified partner Babette Märzheuser-Wood. We opened an office in Hamburg earlier this year.




Comments



In a recent case involving a Body Shop franchise, the German Court of Appeal decided that the exclusive 100% purchase tie contained in the franchise agreement was unenforceable because it violated EU competition law.  The EU Vertical Restraints Block Exemption which applies to franchise agreements contains a provision whereby sellers must be permitted to source 20% of their products from independent sources.  This decision will come as a shock to many franchisors because it has always been thought that the franchise industry is by and large exempt from this restriction based on European case law.

The plaintiff franchisee had been a Body Shop franchisee for 11 years.  Initially, it had been permitted to source certain products independently.  In 2002, the Body Shop imposed a new franchise agreement.  Under this new agreement the franchisee was obliged to purchase all contract goods from The Body Shop or from distributors authorized by The Body Shop.  The franchisee argued that this was an exclusive purchase tie which violated EU law and was unenforceable.  The Body Shop defended its position referring to EU case law which suggests that a 100% purchase tie can be justified where it is necessary to protect the uniform image and know-how of the franchise.

The court found that the exclusive purchase obligation did not serve the purpose of protecting the know how of the franchisor.  Nor was it necessary to protect the identity and reputation of the franchise system.  The franchisor was unable to convince the court that there was damage to the brand or system resulting from the sale of some independently owned product.  In the past 18 years, the franchisor had allowed its franchisees to sell up to 35% independently sourced product.  There had been no significant change which made it necessary to include an exclusive purchase obligation in the franchise agreements in order to protect The Body Shop brand from dilution.  The court pointed out that the franchisor could impose quality standards for third party products.

The court did not consider an exemption under the block exemption regulation as this exemption only applies to restrictions with a maximum duration of 5 years, whereas the present franchise agreement had a term of seven years.

What should franchisors do?

  • Any German franchise agreements that impose a 100% purchase tie will need to be reviewed;
  • New franchisors and those making system changes need to think carefully about justification for full purchase ties.

For more information on franchising in Germany or the new draft legislation, please contact Babette Märzheuser-Wood or Vicky Reinhardt.


Printer friendly version

To opt-out from future communications please visit: http://info.ffw.com/vtu/ZZ95906799BkB877174a63

This e-mail/publication is provided for information purposes only and is not a substitute for detailed advice on specific transactions and should not be taken as providing legal advice on any of the topics discussed, nor should it be taken as creating a solicitor-client relationship between the reader and Field Fisher Waterhouse LLP.

Please note that where this email/publication contains links to pages/items on third party websites, while such information may be available to be viewed and downloaded, this is subject always to the terms and conditions applicable to the particular website(s). Field Fisher Waterhouse LLP is not responsible for the content or operation of third party websites.

Copyright Field Fisher Waterhouse LLP 2007. All rights reserved.