|
New Belgium Franchise
Law
1. On 18th October a
new franchise law is due to come into force in
Belgium with retrospective effect from 1 September
2005.
2. The new law requires franchisors
to deliver a formal disclosure document to
potential franchiees one month before the
franchise is entered into. Failure to do so will
potentially render the Franchise agreement
unenforceable.
3. The law side steps the
problems posed by attempting to define franchising
by referring to "commercial partnerships" instead.
These are defined as "agreements made between two
persons, each of whom is acting in his/her own
name on his/her own behalf, by which one person
grants to the other, in return for a consideration
of any nature whatsoever, whether directly or
indirectly, the use of one or more commercial
formulae for the sale of goods or the provision of
services in one or more of the following forms: a
common sign; a common trade name; the transfer of
know-how; commercial or technical assistance"
.
4. The franchisor must provide potential
franchisees with a disclosure document at least
one month before closing and stipulates that "No
undertaking may be given, and no consideration,
sum of money or deposit may be paid or required
prior to the expiry of a period of one month
following the issue of the [disclosure] document".
5. The disclosure document must comprise
of two separate sections. The first summarising
the main terms of the franchise agreement and the
second detailing "information relating to the
correct evaluation of the commercial partnership
agreement"
6. In the event that the
franchisor fails to comply with the disclosure
requirements the franchisee may choose to have the
agreement become null and void within a period of
two years of the date that the agreement came into
force. If the disclosure document fails to
properly summarise the terms of the franchise
agreement those terms will not be enforceable.
7. Both parties are placed under a duty of
confidentiality as regards information that they
obtain "with a view to entering into a [franchise]
agreement, and may not use the information, either
directly or indirectly, other than for the
purposes of the commercial partnership agreement
to be entered into" .
8. Next year there
will be an evaluation report issued by the
government examining the extent to which the
pre-contractual disclosure has "contributed to the
integrity, the clarity and the balance of
commercial partnership agreements". The report
will also identify any terms in agreements which
it believes "clearly create an imbalance between
the parties, inter alia, non-competition clauses
and clauses which determine the re-sale value, the
recission and termination clauses, and the
obligations to achieve a result"
.
|